LLM frameworks

LangChain vs LlamaIndex

Two dominant open-source frameworks for LLM applications, with overlapping but distinct sweet spots.

Quick verdict

LlamaIndex if RAG and data ingestion are the core. LangChain (with LangGraph) if agents, workflows and tool orchestration dominate. Many teams use both.

What each actually does

LlamaIndex is opinionated about ingestion, indexing and retrieval — the RAG side of the stack. It's the fastest path to a production-grade retrieval pipeline.

LangChain is broader — chains, tools, agents, memory and integrations. LangGraph adds durable stateful workflows for real agentic systems.

Neither is required. Many teams outgrow both and land on a custom orchestration layer for production. Both are fine starting points.

LangChain

Framework for building LLM apps with chains, agents, tools and memory. LangGraph adds durable stateful workflows.

Strengths
  • Rich integrations (200+)
  • LangGraph for stateful agents
  • LangSmith for evals + observability
  • Broad community
Weaknesses
  • API churn between versions
  • Abstraction layers can obscure control
  • Not RAG-specialised out of the box

LlamaIndex

Framework specialised in data ingestion, indexing and retrieval-augmented generation.

Strengths
  • Best-in-class ingestion (LlamaHub)
  • Query engines optimised for RAG
  • Cleaner APIs for retrieval workflows
  • Good evaluation primitives for RAG
Weaknesses
  • Narrower scope than LangChain
  • Agent framework less mature
  • Smaller integration surface

Side-by-side

CriterionLangChainLlamaIndex
RAG maturitySolidBest-in-class
Agent frameworkLangGraph — production-readyAgent Runner — growing
IntegrationsVery broad (200+)Focused on data + LLMs
Evals / observabilityLangSmithBuilt-in eval + Trulens
Learning curveSteeper (many abstractions)Gentler for RAG
Production readinessHigh with LangGraphHigh for RAG pipelines

Choose LangChain when

  • Agentic workflows with tool orchestration
  • Multi-step chains with branching
  • You already use LangSmith or want it
  • Broad integration needs

Choose LlamaIndex when

  • RAG is the primary workload
  • Complex ingestion from many source types
  • Query engines with re-rank and hybrid
  • Cleaner surface for a smaller team
The pragmatic answer

Use both, on purpose

Common pattern: LlamaIndex for ingestion + retrieval, LangGraph for the agent + workflow layer that consumes the retriever. Best of both without over-committing to either.

Frequently asked questions

Do I need a framework at all?

No. For simple chatbots or single-shot generation, raw SDKs are simpler. Frameworks earn their keep when you have multi-step logic, evals or many integrations.

Which is more production-ready?

Both are used in production at scale in 2026. LangGraph specifically has closed the durability + observability gap that plagued earlier LangChain deployments.

What about custom orchestration?

For large teams shipping many AI features, a thin custom orchestration layer often wins long-term. Use these frameworks to move fast; graduate when abstractions hurt more than they help.

Ready to Build Your AI Product?

Talk to a senior AI consultant from T7 about your industry, workflow, or product idea. Free, no commitment — reply within one business day.

  • · AI feasibility & architecture review
  • · Product / MVP roadmap
  • · Integration & automation strategy